Tag: features

  • Vintage Visionary

    Vintage Visionary

    Thirty-Five years ago, Ibanez was a scrappy upstart guitar company that dared to challenge the big boys at Gibson and Fender. Today, is a dominant force in the guitar universe. • Ibanez was – and still is – a brand of Hoshino, a Japanese company with a U.S. headquarters in Philadelphia. In the mid ’70s, it was building affordable, high-quality clones of Strats, Les Pauls, Jazz basses, and Johnny Smith archtops, enough to earn the company a loyal following of guitar fans – and the wrath of Gibson’s lawyers. After the dust settled on the legal side, Ibanez quickly hatched a gaggle of amazing guitar designs: the Iceman, Artist, and Professional models among them. Even more exciting, artists such as Steve Miller, Bob Weir, Paul Stanley, and the venerable George Benson jumped onboard, adding even more credence to the Ibanez phenomenon.

    A live shot of Steve Miller playing an Artist, from the ‘77 catalog. Known informally as the Bob Weir model

    Behind much of this success was Jeff Hasselberger, whose designs and marketing prowess helped propel the perception of the Ibanez brand from “cheap Asian knockoff” to “cutting edge, yet affordable guitar maker” in just a few short years. Today, Jeff runs a marketing firm that caters to the MI industry, but here, he reminisces about these wild-and-wooly early days of Ibanez.

    Jeff Hasselberger with the Hasselcaster, a parts guitar made by his sons (from left) Alex, Ian, and Mark for his 60th birthday.

    You worked for Hoshino from 1973 to ’82. What was your title and role back then? 

    I was the second American employee at the Elger Company, which was the original name of Hoshino U.S.A., so an appropriate title would be “Number 2.” We had a small staff and just a bunch of desks in a room, plus a warehouse, so everybody pitched in on everything. I didn’t have an official title, initially, but it became director of marketing. My role grew into creating the ads, designing guitars, doing artist relations, visiting dealers, doing all the copywriting, and running R&D. In my later days, I also got involved in the international marketing.

    For many, their first experience with Ibanez was playing the “lawsuit” guitars that cloned Gibsons and Fenders. Tell us about that era. 

    When I joined the company, the copies they made at the time were “Close, but no cigar,” as they say. I could see, however, that the copy business was very viable, and if Hoshino could make Ibanez the best of the copies, they’d have a good launching pad for the brand. But, for example, the Les Paul copies had bolt-on necks and the neck wasn’t sunk deep enough into the body. Also the fingerboard had a rounded edge – it was a little goofy-looking. I suggested they set the neck in properly and tend to some of the details of construction that would make the guitar more faithful to the original. I think that was one of the reasons Ibanez developed a following among players who could tell the difference.

    Didn’t Gibson and Fender get ticked off?

    I’d have to say that most of the industry didn’t consider us much of a threat. In fact, they pretty much ignored us, and that really worked in our favor. Gibson was part of Norlin and Fender was still with CBS. They are very sharp companies these days, but in the ’70s, they were asleep at the wheel. We operated very successfully below their radar until ’77.

    Can you briefly sum up the lawsuit itself?

    Imports of all sorts were beginning to be a thorn in the side of the big U.S. companies in the late ’70s. The boys in the tassel loafers at Norlin decided to do something about it, and of all the copy guitars, we were the juiciest target. Plus, we were the most flagrant violators. Rather than sue all the copy companies, they just sued us and figured they could take the judgment, wave it in front of every other copy company, and get them to capitulate.

    We had seen the end of the direct-copy business coming. I can remember sitting around one day in the mid ’70s, wondering what we would do if we were Gibson. I think the consensus was that we’d sue our friggin’ asses. At the time, we understood copyright to cover the peghead and little else. So our first move was to come up with original peghead designs for the copy guitars that would be our interim step. The ironic part was that all the guitars we brought to the 1977 NAMM show had new peghead designs. The lawsuit was dropped on us while we were at the show, so we thought we had lucked out. Long story short, we agreed not to copy Gibson and they agreed not to copy us. Before the next show rolled around, we had a completely new line of guitars.

    Tell us about the new Ibanez designs. 

    By that time, we had a lot of ideas for original designs, but it was more a matter of finding the right opportunity to spring them on the unsuspecting public. The lawsuit gave us that opportunity, and I don’t think Ibanez has ever looked back. Since we had just been sued by a big company, there was more than a little vengeance on our minds. We had something to prove and we now had somebody we could really hate. We took advantage of our upstart reputation and committed ourselves to making guitars that were inspired by whatever the current musical trend was at the time. I think that attitude still exists at Ibanez and I think that’s one of the big reasons for their continued success. And I have to admit, I still feel ill will towards Gibson. I don’t think I’ll ever own a Gibson guitar.

    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Spec sheets for the ‘78 Iceman models. In 1978, Ibanez offered several Iceman models, including the upscale IC400, the korina-body IC300, and the IC210

    One of the transitional guitars was the 2405, which had a quasi-Les Paul shape and mandolin headstock. Another of your designs?

    I think the 2405 Custom Agent was one of the first designs I did for Ibanez. It was around ’73 and it’s one of my many embarrassments. It was inspired by a ratty Les Paul with a mandolin-style headstock repair that came into the retail store where I worked in the late ’60s.  I thought it looked interesting and it stuck in my head. When it came time to start thinking about originals, we started with our frame of reference – Les Pauls and Strats. I went a little overboard with it, using banjo inlays in the fingerboard, a tailpiece-looking inlay in the body, and the curlicue pickguard. It was eventually more successful than I thought it would ever be.

    1979 Ibanez catalog.

    The Professional and Cowboy Fancy models were played by Bob Weir of the Grateful Dead. Tell us about that guitar’s development.

    When I first went to see the Dead in ’74 or so, I didn’t really know what guitar or guitars to take to show them. The copy we did of the Rex Bogue doubleneck was about the snazziest thing we had, so I brought it. I can’t recall what else we took down there. I brought my partner in crime, Roy Miyahara, with me to the show, which was at the old Philadelphia Civic Center – one of those massive airplane-hangar-style joints.

    I kind of paired off with Weir, and Roy hung with Jerry Garcia. Bobby was full of ideas, many of which I’d never heard before… or since, for that matter. He and I hit it off personally and his ideas got my juices flowing, so we started working together. Bob played the double neck through his rig after the show, liked the feel of the neck, and was pretty impressed by the workmanship. I offered to make him whatever he wanted. He didn’t need a doubleneck, but suggested we make a single-neck version for him. I went back, sketched it, and we started talking about pickups and controls. Bob liked the idea of a sliding pickup that could be moved to get different tones, but he also liked the idea of a couple of humbuckers. I suggested that we put a sliding single-coil between the ’buckers and he could play around and see if anything interesting happened.

    That was kind of easier said than done, but I finally got it to work with some hardware-store parts and a drill press. It was easy to slide – stayed put where you left it and was height-adjustable. It was a favorite of Keith Olsen, who produced Bob’s Heaven Help the Fool album and the Dead’s Terrapin Station. Bobby played it like that for a year or so until he stopped moving the pickup around. He could get what he wanted out of it with the single-coil pickup snugged up against the bridge humbucker. So we made another guitar with the pickups fixed in position.

    Bob was also interested in having a guitar with a large headstock, so that produced the designs for the Cowboy Fancy guitars that we started producing in ’76.

    Where did the German-cut edge come from on the Professional and 2617?

    That was pretty much taken from Rex Bogue’s McLaughlin doubleneck. I remember going to see Rex at his place, I think in Glendale, California. He was a terrific guy and a real guitar nut. I actually didn’t feel worthy to even talk to a guy who did such unbelievable work, but he was very down-to-earth and very generous. He was flattered that a “real” guitar company was interested in copying his work and gave us the go-ahead to do what whatever we wanted.

    1977 Ibanez Artist Professional Model 2671 “Randy Scruggs”

    What was George Benson looking for in an archtop, which later became the GB10?

    George told me he always liked the shape of the Les Paul. He said, “The guitar I have in my mind is sort of halfway between the Johnny Smith and a Les Paul.” So I went back to the shop and drew a centerline on a large sheet of paper; laid a Johnny Smith down on it and traced the body shape; and did the same with a Les Paul. Then I free-handed a shape that was kind of in-between, and finished it with French curves. It looked pretty handsome in two dimensions. I took it George, and he agreed. He said, “Let’s start building on that!” I think it was the only guitar I ever designed where the first prototype was pretty on the money.

    Who came up with the design of the Iceman?

    Fritz Katoh was Hoshino’s guitar designer in Japan, while Roy and I came up with designs in the U.S. I’m almost 100 percent sure the Iceman was Fritz’s work. The only thing I added to the party was the name.

    (LEFT TO RIGHT) A late-’70s Ibanez Destroyer. 1978 Ibanez Iceman Artist IC300. ’76 Ibanez Firebrand.

    The ensuing Paul Stanley Iceman model got Ibanez a lot of press. Was it a big seller?

    The actual Paul Stanley Model was fairly expensive, so its sales were limited by that fact. We sold a pile of black Iceman guitars, though. Paul was great to work with, as was Bill Aucoin, his manager. Paul was the creative force behind the whole Kiss zeitgeist – he had a smart business head and was always a gentleman, but he could also listen to the 15-year-old boy inside of him.

    His Mirror Ball Iceman was a big hit, and it still seems to inspire people. I recently got a call from the Fender Custom Shop because Keith Urban wanted a Tele with a cracked mirror job just like Paul’s. He apparently said, “Find the guy who did Paul Stanley’s guitar and ask him how he did it.” So I took them through the process and I understand that it came out great. Probably a much better job than I did on the original.

    Tell us about the thoughts behind the IC210’s triple-coil pickup and the earlier “sliding” pickup on the Iceman.

    Those were from Fritz’s fertile mind. He was very good at thinking outside of the box about 25 years before anybody thought of using that phrase. The Tri-Sound switch of the later ’70s was a direct descendant of those early forays with the Iceman. In fact, the triple-coil is what drew Steve Miller to the Iceman.

    Miller used Ibanez axes on Book of Dreams. What was he looking for in a guitar that Gibson and Fender couldn’t fulfill?

    Steve was another guy who I hit it off with from the get-go. When you first meet him, his personality seems somewhere between cocky and mischievous. Steve also has the sixth sense of a pop artist – he knows when the tide is about to change. In the ’70s, he’d heard about enough of the Les Paul/Marshall sound that was becoming ubiquitous to the point of cliché. He started looking for something different. He told me later that he was inspired by the guitar sound of “Sweet Home Alabama” and was looking for an instrument that would take him in that direction. The triple-coil Iceman had a lot of the same sort of tones in it, and fortune smiled on us when Steve found one in a guitar shop and took it home.

    Artist, from the ‘77 catalog. Known informally as the Bob Weir model, the 2681 later became known as the Ibanez Professional. The ornate 2681 endorsed by country artist Randy Scruggs. Note the arched top with “German Cut” edges.

    If there’s any rap on vintage Ibanez solidbodies, it’s that the Super 70 and Super 80 humbuckers weren’t very good. They tended to be thin, which is why so many vintage models now have replacement pickups on them. 

    Early on, in the ’70s, we were focused on making pickups as hot as we possibly could. Of course, we overshot and made some pickups that were too powerful for their own good. As the decade came to a close, old PAFs and lower-output pickups became trendy. Naturally, we overshot in that direction, as well (laughs)!

    Were all Ibanez guitars built back then in the FujiGen Gakki factory in Japan?

    A lot of them were. All of the set-neck guitars were from Fuji, and many of the bolt-ons. Fuji was less price-competitive on the bolt-on guitars and many of those models were sourced from other factories. In my opinion, Fuji did the best work in Japan at the time.

    One key thing about Ibanez guitars back then is that they beat Gibson and Fender, not only in quality, but in price… often substantially.

    Japan had a distinct cost advantage on a number of fronts. Labor cost was lower, factories were more efficient than here, profit margins were less – those advantages added up to a big gap in retail pricing.

    Is it gratifying to know that vintage Ibanezes from your era are now sought-after by collectors? 

    I’m amused as well as gratified. I was happy enough that people bought our guitars each month, much less considered them having collector potential. I was given a terrific opportunity by the Ibanez folks at a time when the solidbody electric guitar had just been defined as a musical instrument.

    Do you have a favorite Ibanez guitar from back then? 

    Oddly enough, I have only one Ibanez from back then – a basic dot-neck 24-fret Artist. It was damaged in shipping and has a big gash in the back, but still plays great. My son has it now. I helped put the deal together for the reissue of the Bob Weir Cowboy Fancy Limited Edition and I managed to keep the prototype for myself. I regret that I don’t have a George Benson model. Maybe your readers could take up a collection and buy me one (laughs)!



    You can receive more great articles like this in our twice-monthly e-mail newsletter, Vintage Guitar Overdrive, FREE from your friends at Vintage Guitar magazine. VG Overdrive also keeps you up-to-date on VG’s exclusive product giveaways! CLICK HERE to receive the FREE Vintage Guitar Overdrive.


    This article originally appeared in VG July 2011 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • The Electro-Harmonix Germanium 4 Big Muff Pi

    The Electro-Harmonix Germanium 4 Big Muff Pi

    Electro-Harmonix Germanium 4 Big Muff PiElectro-Harmonix Germanium 4 Big Muff Pi
    Price: $133 (list)/$99.75 (street).
    Contact: ehx.com.

    The Big Muff Pi overdrive is the effect stompbox that put Electro-Harmonix on the map, and in the decades since its introduction, it has undergone changes both subtle and substantial. Today, the company’s lineup includes no fewer than 10 versions including the newest, the Germanium 4 Big Muff Pi.

    Each of the latest box’s two channels – labeled Overdrive and Distortion – has an on/off true-bypass stompswitch with LED indicator. The Overdrive channel has controls for Gain, Bias, Tone, and Volume, while the Distortion channel has controls for Gain, Bias, Volts, and Volume.

    To test its sounds, we plugged it in between a ’50s reissue Fender Telecaster and a mid-’60s Fender Bandmaster head running through a vintage Fender 2×12″ cabinet. The Germanium 4 Big Muff’s Overdrive side offered a light overdrive/boost with that familiar ’60s Big Muff fuzz tone dressing up its high-end response. While the Gain, Tone, and Volume controls reacted as one would expect on an OD, the Bias control gave it real character. Altering the signal before it’s distorted, the Bias acts a lot like a tone control, but with more attitude – mellow, with less gain when turned fully counter-clockwise, transparent when straight up, and when fully clockwise, bright and snappy, with more gain.

    The Distortion side offered substantially more gain, its Bias control dialing in sounds ranging from smooth and lush to bright and aggressive, and the lack of a Tone control doesn’t hinder the variety of distorted tones one can extract from it. The most interesting feature on the G4 Big Muff is its Volt control, which affects the amount of voltage supplied to the transistors, which simulates a low or dying battery. With the control turned completely clockwise (sending full voltage) the tone is full and uncompressed, and as it’s dialed back, the tone becomes more compressed, with a low-fi grit, until it sounds almost gated, with a sputtering effect – cool, and very creative. Since each side has its own footswitch and the Distortion side cascades to Overdrive, you can use the Overdrive side to boost output volume and use for the Distortion side for soloing or to add gain for a super-saturated sound.

    The G4 Big Muff Pi is the most versatile version in the pedal’s lineage, and does its predecessors proud.


    This article originally appeared in VG February 2011 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • R.C. Allen

    R.C. Allen

    R. C. Allen
    R.C. Allen, a noted luthier who built archtops for local and regional players of note and was a fixture at vintage-guitar shows in Southern California, died March 2.

    Allen was renowned for sharing his secrets of guitar building and was the last of the original electric-guitar builders in Southern California. Known for his archtops, he made guitars for Merle Travis, Del Casher, and many more.

    As a teen, Allen developed his technique with guitars that had chambers, which he learned from John Dopyera (Dobro) and Paul Bigsby, whose solidbody electric guitar bearing serial number 2 became Allen’s; he displayed it at guitar-show booths that he often shared with Guy Devillez and his brother, John Anderson, often allowing passersby to play it while telling them about its historical significance. Displaying his much-appreciated sense of humor, he made a copy of the guitar for Four Amigos guitar-show producer Larry Briggs with a logo that read “Brigsby.” When show attendees would ask for a picture with him, he would slyly turn half around, reach in his pocket, `pull out a set of crooked/stained fake teeth, and turn around with a big smile on his face.

    Another of his customers, Rebecca Apodaca, recalled how when he presented her with a guitar he’d built for her, he was beaming from ear to ear. “I was admiring the wood he chose for its top – burled maple, stained brown. It was the color of my skin tone,” she said. “As I admired the inlays, he flipped the guitar around, and on the back of the headstock was a sticker that said ‘Made in Japan.’ We laughed! Then he pointed to the center of the back, and along the seam, the wood was figured in the shape of a heart. He smiled and said, ‘Look, I’m giving you my heart.’ I am lucky to say I will always have the heart of R.C. Allen.”

    Apodaca also recalls a story Allen enjoyed telling about delivering a guitar to Glen Campbell. Campbell was working a studio session with a sax player and Allen recalled how, “They were playing the stupidest song I’d ever heard. It only had one word. How can you think anyone would buy a song with one word? It had a nice beat to it, but then they would stop, and Glen would yell, ‘Tequila!’ I don’t think it sold too well,” he would laugh.

    Friends and acquaintances had planned a party/jam to celebrate his 80th birthday, with several music-industry luminaries set to attend.

    “I just sent him a card two days [before he passed] to tell him how much his friendship meant to me,” said pickup maker Seymour Duncan.

    “R.C. was always kind to me, and I tried to return his kindness, but I’m certain that I fell far short of what he gave me,” added guitar “Buffalo Bob” Page, former owner of Buffalo Brothers Guitars.


    This article originally appeared in VG June 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Railhammer Hyper Vintage Humbucker

    Railhammer Hyper Vintage Humbucker

    NAYLOR-RAILHAMMER

    Railhammer Hyper Vintage Humbucker
    Price: $139 list / $89 direct
    Contact: railhammer.com

    Developed by Joe Naylor of Reverend Guitars, Railhammers are passive humbuckers that use a combination of pole pieces on the treble side and rails on the bass side. It’s an interesting motif with an effective purpose.

    The Railhammers’s six oversize poles under the treble strings cover a wider area than standard poles, so they capture the full range of each string as it vibrates. This, Naylor says, helps increase sustain and keeps the strings from sounding thin. The rails below the bass strings sense only a narrow section of each thicker/wound string, which increase clarity and definition. To maintain consistent volume on the bass strings, the rails are height-tapered.

    Another useful feature is the Railhammers’ universal string spacing, which means they’ll fit most guitars.

    We tested Railhammer’s Hyper Vintage neck and bridge models, which use Alnico V magnets and are voiced to emulate a pair of vintage PAFs. Mounted in a Squier Strat with a three-way pickup selector and controls for Volume and Tone, we plugged it into a 100-watt Marshall with an added master volume.

    With the amp set for cleaner sounds, each string rang clearly – distinct and even. Chords were lucid and chimey. At dirtier and crunchier settings with more gain, notes sang with sustain and produced rich harmonics. Full chords and single bass notes sounded tight, while treble notes were smooth, with just enough bite and attack for playing lead and rhythm; this symmetry of tones would work very well for any genre or playing style. With the pickup selector set in the middle position and both pickups in full humbucking mode, the sound of all four coils was quite nice, particularly for cleaner chordal parts and picking. Often, when two humbuckers are used together, single notes become lost among the mids. But the Hyper Vintage pickups are a perfect match – well-balanced, articulate, and complementary of each other through the range of the guitar’s tones. And, they’re very quiet. Even when the amp was cranked, they produced no noise.

    When a guitar sounds good, it can inspire a player to be better, play longer, and be more creative. And who doesn’t want to be enthused by their guitar’s tone? Railhammers’ Hyper Vintage neck and bridge pickups deliver the goods.


    This article originally appeared in VG August 2012 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Ibanez Artcore AF105NT

    Ibanez Artcore AF105NT

    Ibanez Artcore AF105NTIbanez has always had two distinct personalities – first as a purveyor of shreddy solidbodies for the hard rock/metal crowd, but also as a maker of fine archtops, thanks to famous users like George Benson, Pat Metheny, and John Scofield.

    In the ’90s, the company started to brand many of its low-/mid-priced hollowbodies as the Artcore line, imbuing the guitars with a fresh, funky image for alt-rockers, blues players, and jazzers. Depending on how a particular Artcore guitar is appointed, it might veer to one genre or another; the fancy AF105NT is on the high-brow side and will likely turn on jazz and blues players.

    When you hold the AF105NT, your eyes will bug out and you’ll start droolin’ over its flamey natural top. Not to put too fine a point on it, this guitar is drop-dead gorgeous. The maple veneer on the top, back, sides, and even pickguard (likely a photo-flame decal) is stunning. To top it off, the Ibanez folks created dark, wooden control knobs and tailpieces that are downright sexy.

    The guitar’s rosewood fingerboard – which has a 12″ radius – has a custom inlay of an abalone/mother-of-pearl composite and they distantly echo the “slashed diamond” inlay of classic Gibson Super 400 archtops. The AF105NT also has a bubinga/maple neck sandwiched in three sections – a move both cost-saving and attractive. Other details on this jazzbox are a pair of Custom 58 humbuckers with ceramic magnets, two volume and tone controls apiece, gold hardware, 22 medium frets (with nicely rounded edges), and a 243/4″ scale, akin to a Les Paul. The only design faux-pas is a small knot in the grain on the back of the headstock. It’s not a big deal, but it caught my eye – it seems out of step on a guitar that is otherwise so flawlessly constructed.

    Plugged into amps by Ultrasound and Line 6, the AF105NT performed admirably. Ibanez is marketing these guitars to a range of players, so they’re set up with light-gauge strings and low action, to broaden their appeal. This is clever, ensuring the guitar will immediately feel good to solidbody/rock pickers. Once they catch the jazz bug, they can upgrade to heavier, round-wound strings (trust me, you’ll eventually want heavier G, B, and E strings for a fatter tone – it’s simply jazz-guitar physics). Overall, the guitar sounds very good clean and with moderate amounts of overdrive, if you start leaning towards the Steve Howe/Alex Lifeson side of things. And in typical Ibanez fashion, the neck is fast, another facet that will appeal to players of all stripes.

    What really sets the AF105NT apart from the archtop pack is that it fills a gap in the hollowbody market. Companies like Ibanez and Epiphone have been offering affordable hollowbodies for years, but there has always been a weird hole in the mid-price area; either you get a killer axe for under $600 or over $1,000, but not many in the middle (this one streets at under $900). Feel free to scratch your head. But with this hollowbody, Ibanez is offering a sumptuous, deluxe guitar for a price most players can afford. Granted, they do substitute affordable materials and building techniques here and there to keep the price in check, but most guitarists will never notice.

    In all, the AF105NT is a fine guitar that will be prized by rising jazz/blues players or used as a killer gigging guitar for those who keep their $10,000 vintage archtops at home. Either way, Ibanez does it again, offering impressive quality and value for tasty guitarists everywhere.


    Ibanez Artcore AF105NT
    Price: $1,199.99 (list, with hardshell case)
    Contact: Ibanez.com.


    This article originally appeared in VG December 2010 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Phantom Reissue 1964 PH12

    Phantom Reissue 1964 PH12

    Price: $1,168 (retail)
    Info: www.phantomguitars.com

    From the Hollies to the Mahavishnu Orchestra, from Robert Junior Lockwood to the Stones, the electric 12-string has a prominent place in modern music. And arguably, the most iconic of all electric 12-strings were those Vox guitars manufactured under the auspices of the Jennings Musical Instruments. Phantom Guitarworks is reissuing models inspired by the Jennings instruments, including the Phantom Reissue 1964 PH12 that conjures visions of ’60s rock iconography.

    Our test model arrived finished in a flawless glossy black polyester, with chrome and nickel hardware and a white four-layer pickguard. The five-sided mahogany body, like that originally used from 1964 to ’69, features comfortably rounded edges, a rear belly cut, and two beveled upper bout edges to enhance comfort and playability and reduce weight. Three single-coil alnico pickups, measuring 5.9k to 6k, are humbucking in combination and free of the microphonic characteristics of many of the old imports, a definite Phantom Guitarworks improvement over the Vox original. They are wired through 250k solid-shaft pots (one volume and two tones) with specially machined aluminum knobs and a six-position rotary switch complete with a “handle” threaded into place. Virtually all the parts are custom-built for Phantom Guitarworks, including the bridge and its cover. The proprietary tremolo is fastened to the pickguard with four screws; it features six rollers and a spring especially tensioned for 12 strings.

    The rock-maple neck, also in black finish, sports a 25.5″ scale and a single-bound rosewood fingerboard with white markers and small frets. The neck is mounted using four screws through a rear neckplate (truss-rod adjustments are made at the base of the neck, necessitating neck removal), and the aluminum nut has a tight 45mm width. The Phantom logo appears in script on the top of a simple but shapely headstock that complements the body lines; there are Kluson-style nickel tuners and two string trees.

    Build quality and playability is a priority for Phantom Guitarworks (many vintage examples suffering to the degree of being barely playable). In the lap, the PH12 sits comfortably, though it feels best hung from a strap. Plugged in, it offers a broad palette of sonic colors, from fat to bright to brighter. As mentioned, pickup combinations are humbucking due to a reverse-wound/reverse-polarity strategy, a feature unavailable on the Vox original. And the handle on the switch knob makes accurate pickup selections easy to both see and feel.

    The PH12’s relatively narrow neck makes the fretting hand’s transition from a six-string feel easy. Yet there’s enough room to accommodate fingerpicks, and with a flexible plectrum the Phantom 12 achieves a zither-like response that brings out one’s inner inclinations for world music. The setup facilitates a stress-free playing experience (though with the vibrato arm in combat position, the master volume can be a bit difficult to access). The tone controls are effective, but the PH12 sounds best full out.

    Just the thought of a 12-string with a tremolo unit requires a leap of faith, but Phantom Guitarworks’ unit works well for subtle modulations. The guitar comes back to pitch dependably, and the trem action is purposely set up stiffly to discourage ill-advised dive-bombs. Though single-note lines are solid and balanced, the PH12 proves to be a rhythm guitar par excellence.

    The Phantom Reissue 1964 PH12 is modeled after the U.K. instrument, not those lesser-quality Italian-made guitars, with all the modern conveniences and enough vintage British Invasion weirdness for any guitar geek to appreciate.


    This article originally appeared in VG February 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • James Elkington

    James Elkington

    JAMES_ELKINGTON_01

    James Elkington tweaked the paradigm when he began working at a luthier shop before hitting his stride as a guitarist. Born and raised in a small English village northwest of London, his interest in the guitar blossomed relatively late.

    “It seemed the coolest instrument on offer and, as most of us guitar players have found out, it’s immediately kind of gratifying; compared to the violin, you can make quite musical sounds on the guitar without having any idea of what you’re doing.”

    The aesthetics of guitars were also appealing to the aspiring player.

    “Clarinets all look the same, but the fact that a Fender Jazzmaster can be as different to look at as a Gretsch White Falcon, and still operate the same way, was amazing to me,” Elkington said.  “I used to spend entire math classes drawing Vox Phantoms. When I was 13, the first Smiths album came out, and it struck me that I wanted to do exactly that.”

    Moving to London to purse his musical fortune, Elkington became frustrated when his ideas didn’t pan out, and a sour experience working at a music store added to his disenchantment. However, a move to the U.S. and employment at Specimen Products turned his quest in the appropriate direction.

    “When I moved to Chicago and met Ian Schneller at Specimen, I had to change my policy,” he said. “Working for him was so completely unlike working at a regular music store that you can’t even compare them. He’s an artist, and he works on guitars and amps as a means to fund his sonic experiments. Even though I’d been tooling around with guitars most of my life, I didn’t know much about the mechanics of them, and he taught me all about it.”

    Among the musical aggregations in which Elkington has gigged is the Horse’s Ha, and that group’s recently-released second album, Waterdrawn, is decidedly different.

    “Janet [Bean] and I had started out as a duo, but the band had expanded to a quintet by the time we put the first album together,” he recounted. “Everyone in that band is an in-demand musician in Chicago, and scheduling became difficult, plus the band really wasn’t making enough money to justify dragging everyone out of town, so instead of making the next album the same way, I shelved all the songs in favor of writing and recording a record that Janet and I could play and promote by ourselves.”

    Waterdrawn has a stripped-down sound that evokes comparisons to English folk artists like Pentangle, and, not surprisingly, Elkington is a fan of the late guitarist Bert Jansch.

    “That music is a big influence, for sure, though the content of the songs is quite personal to us – there aren’t any ‘Reynardine’ covers in there,” he said.  “Folk music was very derided in England when I was growing up in the ’80s, and as a result, I didn’t hear very much of it.  It was only when I moved to the U.S. and started writing songs that someone mentioned to me that they thought I must be into Bert Jansch – which I really wasn’t – and when I finally got hold of some, it was a revelation. Jansch continues to be an influence, and I’m glad to say that I got to meet him a couple of times before he died.”

    Elkington used a budget-model Martin 000-1 on the album, as well as a Yamaha 12-string tuned down, and a National lap steel. Bean played a Weber mandola, and both used alternate tunings and capos to evoke unique sounds on songs such as “A Stoney Valentine” and “Stick Figure Waltz.”

    With other bands, Elkington uses electric guitars, and espouses a utilitarian view of them.

    “I’ve seen so many collectible guitars that are absolutely no fun to play, and I really have no interest in that for myself, so almost every guitar I have has different pickups from stock and has been re-fretted. I play Telecasters, for the most part, and my main guitar is a red one with a pre-CBS neck and an ’80s body. I’ve also got a couple of parts Teles I take on the road, and they all have Lindy Fralin pickups, which are wired in series as well as parallel to make them a little thicker-sounding. I have a Danelectro and a Teisco from the ’60s that I like, a ’66 Fender Jaguar that I’ve had since I was 18, and a Sho-Bud pedal steel I haven’t been able to make any sense of yet.”

    An expectant parent when VG conversed with him, Elkington, stresses that family comes first. “I have so many unfinished projects at this point that I’ll be glad just to be in Chicago working on those between diaper changes,” he said.


    This article originally appeared in VG April 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Brad Whitford

    Brad Whitford

    Brad Whitford: Ross Halfin.
    Brad Whitford: Ross Halfin.

    Aerosmith’s 2011 Back On the Road tour was a two-month jaunt that consisted of 18 shows and took the band to places it had never been in Latin America before concluding in Japan. Normally, such a tour doesn’t create much hoopla, but this was different. The band hadn’t played there in seven years, but more pertinent was the fact the country was just six months removed from its greatest natural disaster – the Tohoku earthquake. Centered 43 miles off the northeast coast, the U.S. Geological Survey said it was the most powerful earthquake to hit Japan, and the fifth most powerful in the world since modern record-keeping began in 1900. Its devastation carried beyond mere earth shaking, as it triggered tsunami waves that reached more than 130 feet in height and traveled some six miles inland, killing thousands and damaging several nuclear power plants that forced hundreds of thousands to evacuate their homes. By the time of Aerosmith’s arrival in November, its people were primed for musical distraction.

    A new DVD, Rock for the Rising Sun, documents that tour’s eight shows in Japan. Assembled by music-video director/documentarian Casey Patrick Tebo, who has worked with the band for a decade, the film reveals that nation’s love for the band, which has a unique depth and passion expressed by Nobu Tanaka, an Aerosmith fan who has seen more than 150 shows in various places around the world. Asked about the connection he and so many of his countrymen feel, Tanaka cites the cohesion that comes with having been together for decades, and how they “…play from the heart.” We spoke about the tour with guitarist Brad Whitford, the man who crafted some of the band’s grittiest, tastiest, licks – “Last Child,” “Nobody’s Fault,” “Round and Round,” to name a few – as well as the lead breaks on “Sick as a Dog,” “Back In the Saddle” and the band’s early ballads “You See Me Crying” and “Home Tonight.” He was also key in the late-’80s Permanent Vacation comeback (he co-wrote the title track) and the band’s ’90s rebirth. More recently, he has worked as a music producer, played a few stops on the 2010 Experience Hendrix tour, and was even made a playable character in a Guitar Hero game

    Was the tour documented on the DVD scheduled before the tsunami, or put together afterward?

    After; we have so many friends and fans there, and we were shocked and saddened with that horrific set of circumstances – all those things at once. When the opportunity came up, we really felt we had to go and give the people a couple of hours of not having to think about the incredible set of circumstances they were living with. We felt we owed it to them.

    The setlist on the DVD includes some great old material. Do you think the band’s current fans – most of whom were born well after those songs and albums were popular – appreciate the old songs?

    Sure. There’s a lot of people – myself included – who really love all that very early stuff. When you’re in the springtime of your musical career, it’s very fruitful, you know? You have that energy and enthusiasm that’s almost uncontainable. It was a great time for us, and those songs bring it back. I do get a lot of, “When you gonna play this or that?” Usually, I can only tell them, “Uhhh, maybe!”

    On that tour, did the setlist change much from night to night?

    It didn’t change a lot. We usually have a basic list to start, and typically change one or two songs. We have so many songs, but of course we can’t fit them all into a two-and-a-half-hour window. Changing it up a little from night to night makes it more interesting.

    For the band and the fans we see on the DVD who rode the bullet train from show to show…

    Oh yeah, …and they always have requests. But yeah, one of our fans (Tanaka) was with us in Singapore and Australia – the guy travels the world to see us.

    As we see on the DVD, you stick to playing a Tele, a Strat, and a Les Paul. Do you try to stay true to the original sound of each song?

    Sometimes it’s about trying to be true to the original track, but I’m not terribly strict about that. It’s a combination of things; sometimes it depends on what Joe’s playing and I want to make sure the tones are complementary and not getting muddy. My guitars are straight out of the rock-and-roll tool box – a Les Paul, a Strat, and a Tele. You can get an awful lot done with those three instruments. A lot of times, I need to make it work in a specific environment; I use a lot more Stratocaster these days, just for the clarity, and I know it’s not going to get lost. They cut through better, they just do.

    How would you describe Aerosmith’s relationship with its fans?

    I’d say it has evolved into something special. Our shows reflect a great appreciation for what the band and the audience each bring to the table, and we’re playing at the top of our game right now; it’s probably the most fun we’ve ever had. It’s pretty rare to keep this kind of thing rolling with the same guys for so long… That’s not easy to do.

    Do you think fans in Japan, especially, appreciate that the lineup has been so stable for so long?

    Well, I think they’re more adoring. When we first started going to Japan, before we’d start a song, the crowd would go dead silent because they didn’t want to miss a note of it. So we didn’t hear that typical auditorium “buzz.” It was a little hard to get used to, at first. You play almost anywhere else in the world, the arena is full of conversation, this and that. But, in Japan, they’d sit, just waiting. They might sing along, but they’d wait until the very end of the song to applaud and whatever, then go silent again. They have a special kinship with music.

    Aerosmith’s new DVD, Rock for the Rising Sun, documents eight concerts in Japan following the Tohoku earthquake.
    Aerosmith’s new DVD, Rock for the Rising Sun, documents eight concerts in Japan following the Tohoku earthquake.

    Obviously, very respectful…

    Yeah, a deep appreciation. And it makes you want to deliver for them, you know? Also, a higher percentage of them travel to every show, usually on the bullet train. We rode the train to every stop with some of them, and stayed in the same hotels. But they’re never pushy or anything. They just want to be there.

    Which amps are you playing through these days?

    Live, I’ve been using a combination of Paul Reed Smith and 3 Monkeys amps. I have a very close relationship with Paul Smith and Doug Sewell, who builds the amps for Paul. Simply put, they’re great old Marshalls (laughs), but they don’t blow up! I love them. The 3 Monkeys was built for me, and it’s 100-watt based on a Marshall. Joe is using actual Marshalls. Yesterday, I heard some stuff from our first album, and I was floored at the sound of the guitars. It was recorded on 16-track – no monkey business, right to tape. Boy, that’s the sound!

    How do you compare and contrast your style and sound to Joe’s?

    That’s a tough question… I think the best way to describe it would be that he plays more from his gut while I try to play from my gut but maybe intellectualize it a little more; I want to play it like he plays it! When he’s on, he’s incomparable. And, he’s more of a showman than I am, for sure. I’m happy to just be up there playing (laughs), but he rides the wave more, and on the past couple of tours he has gone to new levels, which makes it that much more fun for me.

    In what ways is Aerosmith today better than ever?

    There’s an appreciation for what we’ve done, and the level of musicianship has gone up. And, I think, we’ve gone back to just playing from the heart, wanting to recapture that initial energy, where we didn’t think about it, but just went for it. That’s really where it needs to come from, what makes it special and unique. It’s all about the performance; I wish we could take it to that level in the studio, we haven’t got back there yet. I keep pushing it, I keep trying to stop the ProTools people at the door, because I just don’t like that stuff anymore. And, I’m seeing all these young bands go into the studio with no click track – just a 24-track machine, no computers anywhere in sight, getting records pressed on vinyl. You listen to them and you go, “Oh my god! You can still do it. We should go in and do it like that!” It sounds so great.


    This article originally appeared in VG October 2013 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Mark Knopfler

    Mark Knopfler

    Knopfler with a Pensa Custom. Mark Knopfler: Fabio Lovino.
    Knopfler with a Pensa Custom.
    Mark Knopfler: Fabio Lovino.

    Very early in life, Mark Knopfler had a connection with music. His mother cared for the family while BBC programs like “Listen with Mother” played on the radio with its child-oriented stories, songs, and nursery rhymes. But it was an uncle named Kingsley who had the biggest impact on young Mark’s informal music education when he entertained the family by playing piano, harmonica, and banjo. Though the boy very much wanted to jam along on a fancy red Fender Strat like the one played by Hank Marvin, like every other kid in England at the time, he had to settle for something like the Höfner Super Solid bought by his parents.

    At 16, Knopfler formed a vocal duo with a school friend and the two played folk clubs in their hometown of Newcastle upon Tyne. Several years later, while studying journalism in college and working as a cub reporter for the Yorkshire Evening Post, he interviewed a local musician named Steve Phillips, who not only introduced him to the music of many more folk and blues performers, but turned him on to the resonator guitar. By his late 20s, Knopfler was firmly focused on making music, writing songs, and performing. In early 1977, he and his guitarist brother, David, formed a band with bassist John Illsley and drummer Pick Withers. Within a few months, they had recorded a five-song demo that included a song called “Sultans of Swing” that was getting airplay on BBC Radio London. The exposure led to being signed by the Phonogram label, recording their first album, a tour opening for Talking Heads, and in turn a U.S. record deal with Warner Brothers.

    With their self-titled debut album as springboard, Dire Straits spent the next several years rising to stardom. The disc reached the top 20 in the U.S., and in some parts of the world shared Top 5 sales spots with the band’s own follow-up, Communique. By the end of 1980, they’d released a third album, Making Movies, and were the recipients of growing acclaim that already included Grammy nominations for Best New Artist and Best Rock Vocal Performance by a Duo or Group (both garnered thanks to the international success of “Sultans of Swing”).

    In May of 1985, the band released its fifth studio album, Brothers in Arms, which included the song “Money For Nothing.” Though it contained a controversial lyric line, its wit, irony, intro (with vocals by Sting, borrowing the melody from “Don’t Stand So Close To Me” while singing “I want my MTV!”), huge ZZ-Top-inspired guitar riff rendered on a Gibson Les Paul Standard, and super-hooky chorus made it an instant – and huge – international hit. The album has sold 25 million copies worldwide and in the U.K. was the biggest-selling album of the ’80s. It was also the first album to ship a million copies on compact disc, all but cementing it as the preeminent format for music distribution at the time.

    In the nearly 30 years since, Knopfler has written music for several films, played and recorded with Bob Dylan, Van Morrison, the late Chet Atkins and many others, been invested by the Prince of Wales with England’s OBE designation, had a dinosaur named after him, and become known for his charity work and passion for the land and people of northeast England.
    His most recent recording, Privateering, is his eighth solo album and first double disc. Delivered with the help of fellow guitarist Richard Bennett and bassist Glenn Worf, both of whom have accompanied him since the mid ’90s, it has the bare-bones sound and approach that has largely defined Knopfler’s style and holds strong to the tradition of the singer/songwriter, emanating from myriad musical experiences and personal emotions.

    “I have always thought in terms of the transatlantic nature of music,” he says of the album. “My idea of heaven is somewhere where the Mississippi Delta meets the Tyne. What I wanted, from the very first album with Dire Straits and songs like ‘Sultans of Swing,’ was to write my own geography into the American music that shaped me, to identify the English, Irish, and Scottish landmarks on Chuck Berry’s road. I think what I’m doing now is both synthesizing those influences and separating them. The band I have is so talented and so flexible they give me a kind of palette to go anywhere I want. I can jump from a hill farm in the north of England and go straight to the streets of New York city or down to the delta for a straight-ahead blues.”

    We recently spoke with Knopfler to discuss Privateering and get a feel for his sentiments regarding his life and music.

    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Knopfler’s personal Fender Stratocaster signature model. Knopfler makes frequent use of this 1935 Martin D-18. “There’s just something about it,” he says. “It has a lot of character.” Knopfler used this ’63 Danelectro DC to record “Miss You Blue” and “Corned Beef City” on Privateering.
    (LEFT TO RIGHT) Knopfler’s personal Fender Stratocaster signature model. Knopfler makes frequent use of this 1935 Martin D-18. “There’s just something about it,” he says. “It has a lot of character.” Knopfler used this ’63 Danelectro DC to record “Miss You Blue” and “Corned Beef City” on Privateering.

    What do you remember most about your early exposure to blues music and other American styles?
    I remember clearly; I didn’t actually know that it was blues, per se, because I was six years old, maybe even younger. But I was listening to my uncle, Kingsley, playing boogie-woogie piano, and it hit me like a ton of bricks. I thought, “This is for me.” And of course, later, when I got deep in the blues, it made complete sense. At the age of 15, I was getting into electric blues, which music fans were starting to get switched onto – the B.B. Kings and the Buddy Guys, Paul Butterfield, and others playing at the time.

    About three years after that, I started hearing a bit of Big Bill Broonzy and Josh White, and then, when I was 19 or 20, started to get much more into country blues, as well. So, I sort of worked backward with the blues, and I’m still loving all of it, of course.

    When I got to know Steve Phillips, we got to do a lot of playing together. Steve had a record collection with a lot of good blues, so it was like “University of the Blues” for me; I was deeply immersed in that stuff for a lot of the time and wanted to play a lot of blues. It was good, because in my younger days, I couldn’t afford an amplifier, so I borrowed a friend’s acoustic guitar and played in folk joints, getting exposed to folk music, as well; I’ve always had an interest in folk music and the blues, acoustic music and electric music – always a wide front. And learning to do a basic fingerpick at an early age is a good thing for any guitar player because it opens their world. I was doing a lot of straight pick playing, then slowly but surely, the fingers started to win. I started breaking the rules a bit and developed what you’d call my “style.” Really, it’s just from sitting and falling asleep while playing (laughs)!

    What influenced you most as the songs came together for Privateering?
    I’d been writing a lot, and I’ve always written different kinds of blues as well as the other stuff. I’m that way about folk music, too; I want it to be its own thing and don’t really believe in any “kind” in particular. Certainly, where folk music is concerned, I don’t believe in any orthodoxy at all. I like the idea of putting in whatever I like.

    We cut the blues songs with Kim Wilson, who was great on the sessions, and what you hear is pretty much exactly what we did. I didn’t want them to have a heavily mixed feel, so they were cut to the bone on the floor and they’re very much the way we did them – they don’t have overdubs except for a small bit of guitar on “Miss You Blues,” where I played the picked part with Tim O’Brien playing mandolin and Kim [on harmonica]. Those sessions were great – so much fun. And when we “mixed” them, I wanted it to sound like it did when we cut the songs. So, I guess some of the songs are very orthodox in a sense that they are very much period blues, in their way – they don’t have synths (laughs); it’s mostly straight piano as far as the keyboards are concerned, with some Hammond on “Blood and Water.”

    You cite your band often. What makes it so special?
    Well, we’ve been playing around each other for a long time, and everybody trusts everybody else, basically. We’re used to working with each other, but some of these guys I’ve been with since ’95, so I know what they can do, and they know what they can do, so nobody chases other people around their parts. There’s a lot of confidence. If somebody feels a part isn’t right for them, he’s happy to lay out – nobody feels they have to be in on anything. Certainly, I don’t get in their way… I try not to, anyway.

    (LEFT) When a song or part calls for Knopfler to use a pick, he often grabs this ’54 Fender Stratocaster and plays it with the vibrato bar in his hand while he strums/picks. It was used to record “The Fish and the Bird” on Kill To Get Crimson, “The Car Was The One,” from Get Lucky, and ”I Used to Could” on Privateering. (RIGHT) This ’58 Gibson Les Paul Standard is Knopfler’s go-to guitar when he needs that sort of sound. He used it to record “5:15 a.m.” and “Back to Tupelo” on his 2004 album, Shangri-La, as well as “So Far From The Clyde” on 09’s Get Lucky.
    (LEFT) When a song or part calls for Knopfler to use a pick, he often grabs this ’54 Fender Stratocaster and plays it with the vibrato bar in his hand while he strums/picks. It was used to record “The Fish and the Bird” on Kill To Get Crimson,
    “The Car Was The One,” from Get Lucky, and ”I Used to Could” on Privateering. (RIGHT) This ’58 Gibson Les Paul Standard is Knopfler’s go-to guitar when he needs that sort of sound. He used it to record “5:15 a.m.” and “Back to Tupelo” on his 2004 album, Shangri-La, as well as “So Far From The Clyde” on 09’s Get Lucky.

    The album is a showcase for anyone who appreciates guitar music; there’s electric, slide, resonator, acoustic, and you have guests like Tim O’Brien on mandolin. Does the choice of instrument guide the music, or is it the other way around?
    It’s vice-versa, I think. In terms of the songwriting, what I’m holding certainly tended to dictate. I’ve usually got an acoustic guitar when I’m fooling around at home, so most of the writing would be around that. And, if I’m taking a look at the songs, it will usually be with an acoustic in my hand.

    The guitar I’ve been playing more than any other over the past few years is a D-18 Martin from 1935. It was a present from a friend and there’s just something about it; it has a lot of character – very slatey, kind of dry, but a beautiful sound.

    Another acoustic that gets itself onto records is the Gibson Advanced Jumbo from 1938, which has the Brazilian (back and side) tone. It’s a different thing. They’re both interesting in that they’re jumbo-shaped flat-tops, but you can fingerpick on them. If I want to use a pick and strum a part, usually I’ll use my ’53 Gibson Southern Jumbo, which has a nice, even strum thing going on with itself.

    Another guitar that finds its way into a lot of songs is a mini Martin they did a run of a few years back. They did about 100 of them, and I really love it. It’s a six-string, but tuned up a third of an octave, so it’s just great for little parts. And of course the National tends to find its way onto records all the time – I don’t know why! It’s a Style O from the early ’30s.

    I’ve also been enjoying a Danelectro 59 DC, which I used for the slide part on “Miss You Blues.” Onstage, I started using a white ’65 Strat for slide. I used that guitar on Sailing to Philadelphia and brought it back out to the stage. It’s a beautiful-sounding thing for slide. I usually play my signature Strat or, if I’m doing a pick-and-whammy-bar thing, my ’54, which is another present from the same friend. I put heavy strings on it, with a wound third. It’s usually a toss-up between the ’54 and the Gretsch 6120 from ’57. I like those for just playing notes with a pick and holding the whammy bar in my hand and get the vibrato from my picking motion. Believe it or not, those early Gretsch pickups have a very similar sound. But every now and again, I’ll press my Telecaster into action, which is a ’54. And sometimes I use a ’66 Tele Custom I’ve had since the early Dire Straits.

    Your sound through the years has mostly been associated with a clean, slinky, Strat tone, but on your biggest hit song, “Money For Nothing,” you played a vintage Les Paul Standard. Which Les Pauls do you play now?
    My ’58 [Standard]. Every now and again the ’59 will come into it, and I really like playing an ES-330 that Tony Joe White gave me a long time ago; it’s a great guitar.

    Are there any non-vintage instruments that have caught your favor?
    I really like the Grosh ElectroJet – it’s a great guitar. And the 12-string Burns Double 6 – a more-recent hand-made one, really precision-made and beautiful. It works really well.

    Which guitars did Richard Bennett use on the album?
    He used a lot of guitars, because we were over [in England]; he’d usually pick an old Kraftsman, a Harmony Meteor, or a J-45 I had. He played my Advanced, and I have a ’37 D’Angelico he loves.

    KNOPFLER_07_Privateering

    Did Glenn stay fairly traditional in his choice of basses?
    Glenn played various basses, but usually an early Precision I have. He’s always very happy to play that when we’re in England.

    Which amps do we hear most on the record?
    The usual suspects; there are four or five I go to all the time. On the blues stuff, I’ve been playing my ’59 Fender Bassman. For a lot of the other stuff I used a Reinhardt Talyn, which is a fantastic amp, I love it. There’s a Reinhardt Storm that’s great, too. I also have an older Komet that’s a great amp, as well – very powerful if ever I need it. In fact, it has so much power that sometimes I have to keep it back onstage – put an Airbrake on it. Ken Fischer built it himself and it’s just great. I talked to Ken about it quite a bit; it’s called Linda.

    I also have an old Marshall and I use an old 4×12 cabinet with it; I like a lot of the big amps, like the Komet and the Reinhardts, but for the smaller stuff I’m very often just playing my old Tone King Imperial, which sounds great again – like the old ones. If you buy a Tone King now, you’re getting a really great amplifier. It seems they’re getting closer to the original sound.

    For really pure tone, I need a real Fender Vibrolux – the old brown-tolex one. Just bashing around on the road, just done three lump tours – two with Bob Dylan and one on my own around Europe, and I took a couple Tone Kings – one for playing with Bob’s band. If ever there was a contest for that kind of sound, I’d put up the Vibrolux and the Tone King and see which is right for the song. Though I must say, the Reinhardts can often beat those two – they’re phenomenal.

    Most of the sounds on the album where you hear a straight, clear tone, very often it’s the Tone King on the rhythm channel.

    From its inception, Dire Straits didn’t fit any musical mold, and surely didn’t fit into the scene of the late ’70s, where punk rock was the flavor of the day. Still, the band had immediate and lasting impact. As a performer today, Knopfler remains beyond classification. And while rock stars mostly “survive” trips to the top by simply living to tell, with Knopfler it was more about tolerating overwhelming mass-media attention that flew in the face of his personal sensibilities. But he sallied on, and today continues to make music of the highest caliber.


    This article originally appeared in VG Febuary 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.


  • Wally Stocker

    Wally Stocker

    Wally Stocker with a Les Paul goldtop in 2013. Photo: Alex Solca.
    Wally Stocker with a Les Paul goldtop in 2013.
    Photo: Alex Solca.

    After decades away from the music scene, guitarist Wally Stocker is back on his feet again and back where he belongs, playing lead guitar with a new lineup in The Babys. From 1977 to ’80, the group amassed a string of radio-friendly hits including “Isn’t It Time,” “Every Time I Think of You,” “Head First,” “Back on My Feet Again,” and “Midnight Rendezvous.”

    As lead guitarist, Stocker provided the six-string muscle that powered those hits up the charts.

    Born March 27, 1953, in London, Stocker took up guitar at age nine. A passionate devotee of Free guitarist Paul Kossoff, he honed his chops in short-lived bands Joy and Pegasus. His break came in 1975, when he joined the fledgling The Babys, which included lead vocalist/bassist John Waite, keyboardist/guitarist Michael Corby, and drummer Tony Brock. Signed to Chrysalis on the basis of a four-song video, the band released five albums – The Babys, Broken Heart, Head First, Union Jacks, and On the Edge – and toured with the likes of Alice Cooper, Cheap Trick, Journey, AC/DC, and Rush.

    The Babys disbanded in December, 1980, and Stocker went to tour and record with Rod Stewart, Air Supply, and Humble Pie. In 2013, The Babys reunited with Stocker and Brock alongside new recruits lead singer/bassist John Bisaha and guitarist J.P. Cervoni. Last July, the band performed its first gig in almost 33 years.

    At age 60, Stocker’s playing is remarkably rust-free – his trademark smoky slow-hand vibrato and chunky rhythm guitar colors proudly intact.

    What was your first guitar?
    On top of a wardrobe in my parents’ bedroom was an old flamenco guitar that sat there for years. I used to ask my dad, “What are you gonna do with that? Can I mess around with it?” Finally, he said “Alright.” So, I bought a beginner’s book and practiced all the time. When I started, I couldn’t get the fingering right, so I put it into an open tuning where I could play the chords with one finger. I quickly realized I wasn’t going to go anywhere playing that way, so I tuned it and learned to play properly.

    Who were your earliest influences?
    A guy named Lonnie Donegan, who performed skiffle music. Also, Bert Weedon, who played a big semi-acoustic on TV. Another big early influence was Hank Marvin of The Shadows. I liked the way he’d play these great melodies on the guitar.

    When did you get your first electric guitar?
    Not until I was 16. I left school at 15 and got a job working in a factory. I used to cycle to work past this pawn shop and I’d look at this red guitar in the window and say, “One day I’m gonna have that!” And eventually, I did. It was a no-name electric – very cheap, looked like a Strat. My dad had an amplifier he rigged as a baby monitor for my brother when he was born. That was my first setup!

    Paul Kossoff was a big influence on you as a player…
    I used to go see Free all the time. I was inspired by the sparseness in Koss’ playing and his soulful, bluesy lines. He’d work off of Paul Rodgers’ vocals and know when to sit out, just leave space for everybody. I applied that approach later with The Babys. I realized that sometimes less is more.

    You can hear the impact of Kossoff’s vibrato on your work.
    It was just so unique, bending in and out of notes; a lot of guys were relying on the vibrato arm to get that sound, but he had it down. He was playing guitar like a violinist would do vibrato on a violin. Koss had this lovely richness to the vibrato, and everything Koss played was tasty and soulful; and that straightforward sound of a Les Paul through a Marshall was very influential on me, as well.

    Though I listened to other players like Peter Green and Leslie West, I always came back to Kossoff. Rhythm wise, I also liked Keith Richards, Chuck Berry, and Eric Clapton, especially his work in Cream. I also really liked Steve Marriott’s solid rhythm playing and great riffs in Humble Pie.

    How would you define your approach to playing guitar in The Babys?
    I go for a less-is-more approach. The Babys were very blues-based. We liked the same kind of bands. Sometimes, I look at other guitarists and go, “Wow, I couldn’t do that in a million years,” but I get more enjoyment in the way I play than being able to go up and down the fretboard all night.

    How did a Gibson Les Paul become your go-to guitar?
    After I got my first Les Paul, I was hooked. I fell in love with the unique sound, the way it feels and the way it plays; I love the tone and the sustain. It’s great for blues and lead playing and it’s great for big, fat chords. It’s the kind of guitar you can plug into any amp and get that tone. I’ve never found anything that surpasses a Les Paul, and that’s why I’ve stuck with them all this time.

    What was your main guitar in the Babys?
    A ’68 Les Paul sunburst custom. I bought it new and made payments every week. I used that guitar on all five Babys albums and it was my main guitar as far as live work, too.

    Other Les Pauls were part of your arsenal…
    That’s right. I had a Les Paul Anniversary model with a flame-maple top and double binding on the body, neck, and headstock, and gold tuners with chrome-plated keystone buttons; the silver represented 25 years of the Les Paul and the gold represented 50 years of Gibson; even the tuners were half and half. I got that from the Gibson factory in 1978. I also had a black Les Paul Deluxe from the mid ’70s with cream P-90s, and I had a Les Paul Standard from the early ’70s. For a short time in ’78, I was also playing a Cherry Red Les Paul Junior I got from a roadie friend. I don’t think I played it live; I used it in the video for “And If You Can See Me Fly.” As far as live shows I’ve played nothing but Gibsons throughout my career.

    Do you still have those guitars?
    No, sadly they’re all gone. They’re the tools of my trade. But because I’ve been out of the circle for a while, sometimes you’re forced to sell something you really don’t want to part with. I’ve had some beautiful instruments through the years. My guitars were an investment and if I could have them all back, it would make for a wonderful collection.

    Now that you’re in the market for new guitars, what has caught your eye?
    Gibson is putting out a limited edition replica of Paul Kossoff’s main guitar which he used in Free with the finish missing and scratches and dents. They’re also putting out a new model based on Koss’ ’58 Les Paul. That looks like a wonderful guitar and I’ve got my eye on that one. It would come full circle if I was able to play something like that.

    (LEFT) Stocker and Babys bassist/vocalist John Waite onstage in 1976; Stocker is playing his Les Paul Custom, Waite a Zemaitis bass. (RIGHT) Stocker in ’76. Photo: Brian Cooke, courtesy of Mark V. Perkins.
    (LEFT) Stocker and Babys bassist/vocalist John Waite onstage in 1976; Stocker is playing his Les Paul Custom, Waite a Zemaitis bass. (RIGHT) Stocker in ’76.
    Photo: Brian Cooke, courtesy of Mark V. Perkins.

    The Babys’ musical template mixed muscular rock like “Head First” with orchestral, soul-tinged pop a la “Isn’t It Time.” What were the challenges you faced working within those two styles?
    I welcomed the challenge. It made recording even more interesting and enjoyable. When the guitar isn’t the main feature in songs like “Isn’t It Time,” you’ve got to invent a part that will fit in but maintain the style you wove into a heavier track.

    Do you employ a different approach, playing guitar in the studio versus a live show?
    Yeah, you start with your basic sound, but you have the freedom to experiment a little more with other tones to embellish the track you’re working on. Recording is like painting by numbers; you layer a track like putting a jigsaw together. I liked the way Jimmy Page would orchestrate guitars and incorporate sounds, and that had an influence on me.

    On Head First and Union Jacks, especially, your guitar sound was huge. How was that accomplished?
    I refused to use an electric doubler. I’d go back in and play off the first guitar and strengthen the part that way; maybe I’d change the tone. I’d want to make sure the guitars were rubbing a little bit and not be completely in sync, which gives it a much bigger and fatter sound.

    Which Babys song do you think best showcases you as a player?
    “Dying Man,” from our first album. There was all kinds of room in that song for me to stretch out, and I remember John (Waite) and I going into the studio together. As he was laying down a vocal, I was next to him doing a guitar track, and we were just playing off of each other. Another one I like is “Laura” from the first album. Our producers, Bob Ezrin and Brian Christian, said, “Why don’t you go off and work out a solo as opposed to playing something off the top of your head? We need something different on this song.” I went off with the track and sculpted a solo, and it worked really well.

    Characterize your approach to crafting guitar solos in The Babys.
    The producer would say, “We’ve got six empty tracks. Lay down six solos, come back and listen, and we can take what’s best.” My solos were all kind of short and sweet and to the point – they had to say something, but it didn’t have to be very long. It just had to build and be melodic. The solo in “Love Don’t Prove I’m Right” is short and sweet. I’ve always liked the solo in “Run to Mexico” and “True Love, True Confessions”; which weren’t overplayed. They were just enough, and that’s the way I like it.

    (LEFT) Stocker with a natural-finish Les Paul. (RIGHT) Stocker in ’79 with the Les Paul Anniversary model he acquired directly from Gibson in ’78 with a flame-maple top. Photo: Vernon Marks, courtesy of Mark V. Perkins.
    (LEFT) Stocker with a natural-finish Les Paul. (RIGHT) Stocker in ’79 with the Les Paul Anniversary model he acquired directly from Gibson in ’78 with a flame-maple top.
    Photo: Vernon Marks, courtesy of Mark V. Perkins.

    What were you using for amps, strings, picks, and pedals?
    For me, it’s Marshall amps all the way. I used a Marshall 100-watt Super Bass head on all the albums, then later bought a Marshall Super Lead, and finally a Marshall with Master Volume. As for strings, I had a deal with Dean Markley. I had custom gauges – .010, .011, .014, .026, .036 and .042. Picks? I used medium plastic Herco picks.

    The pedals I used live were my trusty Roland CE-1 chorus – I liked the warmth of that pedal, plus I could run it in stereo. Instead of plugging straight into the amp, it would round off my sound and give it a nice tone with that slow chorus, close to a Leslie effect. It had a lot more high-end and less growl.

    Now, I use a Boss Chorus along with a Boss Delay.

    How did the Babys reunion come together?
    Tony (Brock) approached me last year about reuniting. We’d gone back and forth through the years and this time it finally felt right. John Waite decided he didn’t want to do it and wanted to focus on his solo career, and we respected that. We found John Bisaha, who plays bass and is a great lead singer, and we also have a second guitar player, J.P. Cervoni.

    Back in the Babys first go-round, Michael Corby and, later, Jonathan Cain, played keyboards and guitar. So, if Michael or Jonathan was playing keyboards, there wouldn’t be second guitar, so that limited me to playing more rhythm during shows. But, a second guitar player frees me to play some of the licks on the original records. It’s exciting to have a second guitar in the band, along with keyboards.

    The band recently played its first gig in nearly 33 years. What was that like for you?
    It was very emotional, exciting – and stressful (laughs)! As soon as we walked on, I felt I’d gone back in time and I could feel the tension fall away as we started the set. It felt like, “This is where I belong, playing the old songs again.” It was something I never really thought was going to come around.

    What’s the most useful piece of advice you could offer budding guitar players?
    All the people who influenced me were players you could pick out of the crowd by their style and sound – as soon as you heard them playing, you knew it was Eric Clapton or Jeff Beck or Jimmy Page. That’s what I always tried to achieve. I developed my own style and tone. I’d suggest they don’t get caught up in multi-effects and hammer-ons, because you don’t want to sound like two dozen other players. Concentrate on being unique, as opposed to one of the crowd.


    This article originally appeared in VG Febuary 2014 issue. All copyrights are by the author and Vintage Guitar magazine. Unauthorized replication or use is strictly prohibited.